The mother had bought her home at a discount under the ‘right to buy’ scheme. Her daughter and son-in-law argued that they had paid the mortgage and most of the utility bills for many years after receiving her assurance that they would inherit the property. It was submitted that she had purchased the house ‘by proxy’ for them on the understanding that she could live there for the rest of her life.
Following a family falling-out, the mother had announced her intention not to leave the house to them. Their response was to apply to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) for a restriction to be placed over the property's title. That would have inhibited the mother’s freedom to deal with the property as she wished.
In rejecting the application, however, the FTT found that there had never been any agreement, or common intention, that the daughter and son-in-law would have a beneficial interest in the house. Although they had contributed to utility bills, the vast majority of mortgage instalments had been paid by the mother. The reality was that the daughter and son-in-law had lived rent-free in the property for 24 years and that the mother could bequeath it to whomever she wished.
If this article raises any matters of concern or queries for you please get in touch with Jane Whitfield, one of our Private Client specialists who would be happy to assist you. Jane can be contacted on at our offices in Reading, Berkshire, on 0118 958 9711 or [email protected]. For a one-off fee of just £95 you can book an hour-long Private Client consultation with Jane or one of the other members of our qualified Private Client legal team.